James Lomax v. Renee Walker
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES MESHACH LOMAX, Plaintiff Appellant, v. RENEE WALKER, Lieutenant; ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-02878-DKC)
October 21, 2009
November 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court's
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Lomax v. Walker, We
for the reasons stated by the district court.
No. 8:07-cv-02878-DKC (D. Md. June 2, 2008 & Jan. 22, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?