US v. William Pearson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v.
WILLIAM JACKIE PEARSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (4:98-cr-00015-LHT-1)
July 21, 2009
August 12, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Edmund Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Jackie Pearson appeals the district court's
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we deny the motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pearson, No. 4:98-cr-00015We
LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 26, 2009, entered Mar. 27, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?