US v. Ricky Eckles
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. RICKY BERNARD ECKLES, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-1)
October 27, 2009
November 12, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Bernard Eckles, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ricky order denying Bernard his 18 Eckles U.S.C. appeals the district court's for
reduction of sentence. * reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. Eckles, No. 5:05-crFeb. 27, 2009); United States v.
by the district court. 00009-RLV-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C.
Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 244 (4th Cir. 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal
We dispense with contentions the court are and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Eckles filed a notice of appeal outside of the appeal period, and we remanded to the district court to determine whether Eckles had demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the appeal period. See United States v. Eckles, 328 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. June 25, 2009) (No. 09-6625). The district court found Eckles demonstrated good cause and therefore deemed the notice of appeal timely filed. Accordingly, we review the appeal on the merits.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?