US v. Terrence Daniels
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TERRENCE ARNEZ DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2)
August 26, 2009
Decided: September 2, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Terrence Arnez Daniels appeals the district court's
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. Daniels, No. 5:01-cr1, 2009). We dispense with oral
by the district court. 00736-CMC-2 (D.S.C.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?