US v. David Wright
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID WRIGHT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH)
January 11, 2010
January 25, 2010
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: David Wright appeals the district court's oral order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. As noted on the district court's docket sheet, the
court denied relief on Wright's motion for the reasons stated in its July 11, 2008 order. The July 11 order reveals that Wright
was not eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 706 because he was held accountable for more than 4.5 kilograms of crack. Because our review of the record reveals no reversible We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
error, we affirm. facts and legal before
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?