Richard Blackburn v. State of South Carolina

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998245623-2] Originating case number: 9:06-cv-02011-PMD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998486842] [09-6677]

Download PDF
Richard Blackburn v. State of South Carolina Doc. 0 Case: 09-6677 Document: 26 Date Filed: 12/17/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6677 RICHARD E. BLACKBURN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS: JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; ROBERT WARD, Regional Director of South Carolina Deparment of Corrections; ROBIN CHAVIS, ECI Associate Warden; MS. SPRATTLING, ECI Grievance Clerk; SANDRA BOWIE, Chief, Branch Grievance; J. GLENN ALEWINE; PRAVIN R. PATEL, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (9:06-cv-02011-PMD) Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 17, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard E. Blackburn, Appellant Pro Se. Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F. Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina; Benjamin Albert Baroody, BELLAMY, Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-6677 Document: 26 Date Filed: 12/17/2010 Page: 2 RUTENBURG, COPELAND, EPPS, GRAVELY & BOWERS, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 09-6677 Document: 26 Date Filed: 12/17/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Richard order adopting in E. Blackburn the appeals the district of the court's part recommendation magistrate judge and denying relief on his civil action. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny Blackburn's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated No. with by the district court. (D.S.C. because Blackburn Mar. the 11, facts v. South We legal Carolina, dispense 9:06-cv-02011-PMD oral argument 2009). and contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?