US v. Gerald Steele
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GERALD LAMONT STEELE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00216-MR-11)
July 30, 2009
August 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Lamont Steele, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gerald order denying Lamont Steele for a appeals the district court's under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d Accordingly, we affirm for the United States v. Steele, We dispense
226, 232-33 (4th Cir. 2009).
reasons stated by the district court.
No. 3:01-cr-00216-MR-11 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid in the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?