US v. Steven Richardson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN GREGORY RICHARDSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cr-00298-F-1)
September 4, 2009
October 1, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Gregory Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Steven Gregory Richardson appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal on the
ground that Richardson's notice of appeal was untimely filed. Although Appeal" the was document untimely, Richardson he captioned filed as a a "motion of for
certificate of appealability" within the ten-day appeal period. Because we construe Richardson's "request" to be a timely notice of appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 3, we deny the Government's motion to dismiss. Nevertheless, we have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the court. United States v. We
and find no reversible error. reasons stated by the
Richardson, No. 5:05-cr-00298-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?