Randy Govan v. Shirley Singleton

Filing 920091015

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-6776 RANDY GOVAN, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SHIRLEY SINGLETON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Ridgeland C.I. and Allendale C.I.; LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution; CHRISTOPHER FELDER, Major Ridgeland Correctional Institution; CARL J. FREDERICK, Director of Operations, SCDC, Defendants ­ Appellees. No. 09-6891 RANDY GOVAN, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. SHIRLEY SINGLETON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Ridgeland C.I. and Allendale C.I.; LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution; CHRISTOPHER FELDER, Major Ridgeland Correctional Institution; CARL J. FREDERICK, Director of Operations, SCDC, Defendants ­ Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03789-MBS) Submitted: September 25, 2009 Decided: October 15, 2009 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Govan, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Randy Govan appeals the district court's order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting 42 U.S.C. Defendants' § 1983 summary civil judgment rights motion as in well Govan's as the (2006) action district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that order. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Govan v. Singleton, No. We legal 8:07-cv-03789-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2009; Apr. 29, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?