US v. Robert Brooks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBERT MADISON BROOKS, a/k/a Pooh, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:02-cr-01173-JFA-2)
September 10, 2009
September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Madison Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Robert Madison Brooks appeals the district court's We have
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Brooks, No. 0:02-cr-01173-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 2009). Brooks' claim that the court could have resentenced him below the
Sentencing Guidelines is foreclosed by this court's opinion in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.), cert denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?