US v. Francisco Curbelo
Filing
920091008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6948
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FRANCISCO CURBELO, a/k/a Murando, Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-7361
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FRANCISCO CURBELO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00109-GCM-DCK-1; 3:09-cv-00150GCM)
Submitted:
September 29, 2009
Decided:
October 8, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francisco Curbelo, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM: Francisco Curbelo seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2009) motion and denying his motion for bail. not appealable unless a circuit justice or
The orders are judge issues a A "a
certificate of appealability. certificate of appealability
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). will not issue absent
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. by § 2253(c)(2) (2006). that A prisoner satisfies would this find
standard
demonstrating
reasonable
jurists
that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El
v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). that We have independently has not made reviewed the of and the record and
conclude
Curbelo we deny to
requisite
showing. deny the
Accordingly, Curbelo's
certificates appoint counsel
appealability, to supplement
motions
record, and dismiss the appeals.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?