US v. Vincent Rutherford
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VINCENT RUTHERFORD, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00049-GCM-1)
December 17, 2009
January 21, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Vincent Rutherford appeals the district court's order denying § 3582(c) his motion for We reduction reviewed of the sentence, record 18 and U.S.C. find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. Rutherford, No. 1:02We deny Rutherford's and request for
by the district court.
cr-00049-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). motion to strike sentencing
evidentiary hearing and incorporated memorandum of law, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?