Robert Peoples v. Leon Davis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT PEOPLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEON DAVIS, Sergeant, Lieber Correctional Institution; JOYCE PERRY, Sergeant, Lieber Correctional Institution; HALLBACK, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institution; Mr. THIERRY NETTLES, SMU Administrator, Lieber Correctional Institution; JEAN RANDAL, IGC, Lieber Correctional Institution; KEVIN WILLIAMS, Lieutenant, Lieber Correctional Institution; JOSEPH POWELL, HCA, Lieber Correctional Institution; DARYL KING, Lieutenant, Lieber Correctional Institution; JON OZMINT, Director, all ind. capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:08-cv-00251-CMC)
January 19, 2010
January 26, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Peoples, Appellant Pro Se. Goforth, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & South Carolina, for Appellees.
Andrew Todd Darwin, Ginger BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Robert Peoples seeks to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court's final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) This appeal period
Browder v. Dir., Dep't of (quoting United States v.
Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court's order was entered on the docket on February 24, 2009. 30, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed on April
Because Peoples failed to file a timely notice of
appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?