US v. Clarence Jefferson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLARENCE JEFFERSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00221-REP-1)
February 25, 2010
March 3, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clarence Jefferson appeals the district court's order denying his motion properly construed as one for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for United States v. We
the reasons stated by the district court.
Jefferson, No. 3:00-cr-00221-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 14, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?