US v. Mohammed Said
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MOHAMMED ASAD SAID, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00556-TSE-1)
January 13, 2010
January 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammed Asad Said, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mohammed Asad Said appeals the district court's order denying his motion to correct judgment and commitment order. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Said, No. 1:03-cr-00556-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
Apr. 30, 2009). facts and legal before
decisional process. AFFIRMED
See Baca v. United States, 383 F.2d 154, 157 (10th Cir. 1967) (where the oral judgment is ambiguous, the written judgment and commitment order may be used to clarify the intention of the sentencing judge); see also United States v. Morse, 344 F.2d 27, 30 (4th Cir. 1965) (the court "should carry out the true intention of the sentencing judge as this may be gathered from what he said at the time of sentencing.").
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?