US v. Phillip Henriques
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PHILLIP HENRIQUES, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:93-cr-00089-MR-2)
December 15, 2009
December 17, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Henriques, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Phillip Henriques appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006) based on Amendment 591. record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for United States v. We
the reasons stated by the district court.
Henriques, No. 3:93-cr-00089-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. June 5, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?