US v. Michael Stacey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. MICHAEL STACEY, a/k/a Sadat, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00134-GCM-4)
September 10, 2009
September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Stacey, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Cave, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Stacey appeals the district court's order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See United States v. Stacey, No. 3:03We dispense with oral
by the district court.
cr-00134-GCM-4 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2009).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?