Rodney Fuller v. Loretta Kelly
Filing
920091229
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7311
RODNEY L. FULLER, Petitioner Appellant, v. LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00117-sgw-mfu)
Submitted:
December 14, 2009
Decided:
December 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney L. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Rodney L. Fuller seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)
petition.
The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice See 28 U.S.C.
or judge issues a certificate of appealability. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). issue absent "a
A certificate of appealability will not showing U.S.C. standard find the that of the denial of a A that the or
substantial 28
constitutional prisoner reasonable
right." this would by
§ 2253(c)(2) by any
(2006).
satisfies jurists
demonstrating assessment is of
constitutional
claims
district
court
debatable
wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Fuller has not made the requisite showing. a certificate with of appealability argument and
Accordingly, we deny the appeal. and We legal
dismiss the
dispense
oral
because
facts
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?