US v. Burnie Randall
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BURNIE LEE RANDALL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:06-cr-00583-TLW-6)
October 15, 2009
October 22, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Burnie Lee Randall, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Burnie Lee Randall appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the United States v. Randall, No. 4:06-cr-00583We dispense with oral argument
TLW-6 (D.S.C. June 30, 2009).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?