Clifford Liabhen v. William Osteen, Jr.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CLIFFORD LIAHBEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., in his individual and official capacity as a practicing attorney in the law firm Adam and Osteen; MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, in his official capacity and his individual capacity as U.S. Attorney General; ANNA MILLS WAGONER, in her official capacity and her individual capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; AULD, in his individual and official capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; JOHN W. STONE, JR., in his official capacity and individual capacity as Assistant U.S. Attorney Press Officer; CARTER CATLET, in his individual and official capacity United States Secret Service Agent; MIKE SAUNDERS, in his individual and official capacity as Detective for Winston Salem P.D.; S. W. TOLLEY, in his individual and official capacity as Detective for the Winston Salem P.D.; DEBORAH MCCLAREN, in her official and individual capacity as Detective for Triad Municipal A.B.C. Law Enforcement; DAVID B. FREEDMAN, in his individual and official capacity as a practicing attorney in the law firm of Crumpler Freedman Parker and Witt; VINCENT FRANK RABIL, in his individual and official capacity as a practicing attorney in the law firm of Crumpler Freedman and Witt; SERGEANT BARTMAN, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the High Bridge P.D., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00226-NCT-PTS)
December 15, 2009
December 18, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clifford Liahben, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clifford adopting the Liahben appeals of the the district court's judge order and
dismissing as frivolous Liahben's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the civil RICO statute. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Liahben v. Osteen, No. 1:09-cv-00226-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
June 29, 2009). facts and legal before
decisional process. AFFIRMED
"Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations" Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (2006).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?