Stacy Howard v. Director Ozmint

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to file formal brief [998356944-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998356944-3] Originating case number: 6:08-cv-03171-GRA-WMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998435941] [09-7393]

Download PDF
Stacy Howard v. Director Ozmint Doc. 0 Case: 09-7393 Document: 51 Date Filed: 09/30/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7393 STACY W. HOWARD, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DIRECTOR JON E. OZMINT, of S.C. Department of Corrections also known as John E. Ozmint; WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON; AARON JOYNER, Major; CAPTAIN KENNETH GREEN; S. SKIPPER, IGC of the Evans Correctional Institution; T. WOOLBRIGHT; S. MOSES; C. FOX; T. SIMMONS; MICHAEL J. STOBBE, Inmate Records; JIMMY EDGE, officer; DAVID BRAYBOY, officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-03171-GRA-WMC) Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers Boan, William Walter Doar, Jr., MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 09-7393 Document: 51 Date Filed: 09/30/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Stacy W. Howard appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for a preliminary injunction, appointment of counsel, and reconsideration. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Ozmint, No. We deny 6:08-cv-03171-GRA-WMC (D.S.C. June 3 & July 13, 2009). Howard's motions to defer filing an appendix, to file formal briefs, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?