US v. Demetrius Williams

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998557116]. Mailed to: Demetrius Williams. [09-7484]

Case: 09-7484

Document: 21

Date Filed: 03/31/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7484

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DEMETRIUS MARCUS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Meat,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (2:95-cr-00193-REP-6)

Submitted:

March 8, 2011

Decided:

March 31, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Marcus Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Tayman,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Laura Pellatiro
Newport
News,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Case: 09-7484

Document: 21

Date Filed: 03/31/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant
to

18

U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2)
have

(2006)

and

reviewed

denying
the

his

record

motion

reconsideration.

We

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief

for the reasons stated by the district court.

and

find

for

United States v.

Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009). *
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

no

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We note that the district court lacked the authority to
consider Williams’s motion for reconsideration.
See United
States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert.
denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010).

2