US v. Keith Harris
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEITH HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00100-FL-2)
January 14, 2010
January 21, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006).
The district court concluded Harris was
not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris' range of imprisonment remained the same, the mandatory minimum sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no error.
Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense
We deny Harris' motion for appointment of counsel.
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?