US v. Wayne Hill
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WAYNE HILL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:05-cr-00707-HFF-6)
December 17, 2009
December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Wayne Hill appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a delayed direct appeal. March 2006 and did not file an appeal. Hill was sentenced in In July 2009, he filed
the underlying motion seeking permission from the district court to note a delayed appeal. specified in Fed. R. App. Assuming the ten-day appeal period P. 4(b) is no longer considered
jurisdictional, see generally Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 209-14 (2007), we find no basis in the record to justify an extension of the more than three years requested by Hill.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of Hill's motion. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
To the extent the district court relied on the appellate waiver contained in Hill's plea agreement, we decline to adopt this reasoning. See United States v. Poindexter, 492 F.3d 263, 273 (4th Cir. 2007).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?