Michael Ray v. Evercom Systems, Incorporated
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL R. RAY, on behalf of himself personally and as initial class representative pending the appointment of counsel to represent the class, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EVERCOM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; LEXINGTON COUNTY, on behalf of Lexington County Detention Center; PAY TEL COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED; JOHN VINCENT TOWNSEND, Personally and as President of Pay Tel Communications, Inc.; SPRINT PAYPHONE SERVICES, INCORPORATED, now known as Embarq Payphone Services, Incorporated; SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD, State of; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FLORENCE COUNTY, on behalf of Florence County Detention Center, Defendants Appellees, and DARLINGTON COUNTY, on behalf of Darlington County Detention Center; DILLON COUNTY, on behalf of Dillon County Detention Center; SPARTANBURG COUNTY, on behalf of Spartanburg County Detention Center; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY, on behalf of Williamsburg County Detention Center; DENNIS L. WHIPPLE, Personally and as President and CEO of Evercom Systems, Inc., Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cv-02904-RBH)
May 20, 2010
May 24, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. Ray, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; John J. Pringle, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, Brant Mitchell Laue, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP, Kansas City, Missouri; Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., Samuel C. Weldon, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, Stephanie A. Joyce, ARENT FOX, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael R. Ray appeals the district court's order
accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing the federal claims with prejudice and dismissing the state law
claims without prejudice. no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons Ray v. Evercom Sys., Inc., No. We dispense with oral
stated by the district court.
4:05-cv--2904-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2009).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?