Alphonso Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of C

Filing 920100225

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7897

ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; WARDEN BOB ANDERSON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN NFN BRILLFORD; MAJOR NFN MURRAY; CAPTAIN EDWARD BITTINGER; LIEUTENANT NFN BRACHEL; SERGEANT NFN FERGUSON; OFFICER NFN FOREMAN; SERGEANT NFN HOOSIER; MS. NFN HUNTER; OFFICER JENKINS; OFFICER JONES; DHO S. PATTERSON; MS. NFN HUNTER, Law Librarian; OFFICER NFN STAATS; OFFICER NFN UPTERGRAFF; MR. NFN STEVENSON, Classification; CAPTAIN B. HINGER; OFFICER UPTAGRAFT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-01841-PMD)

Submitted:

February 18, 2010

Decided:

February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphonso Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Heath McAlvin Stewart, III, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court's

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006)

complaint. error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., We dispense with contentions the court are and

district court.

No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before

adequately

presented

materials

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

3