Alphonso Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of C

Filing 920100225

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7897 ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; WARDEN BOB ANDERSON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN NFN BRILLFORD; MAJOR NFN MURRAY; CAPTAIN EDWARD BITTINGER; LIEUTENANT NFN BRACHEL; SERGEANT NFN FERGUSON; OFFICER NFN FOREMAN; SERGEANT NFN HOOSIER; MS. NFN HUNTER; OFFICER JENKINS; OFFICER JONES; DHO S. PATTERSON; MS. NFN HUNTER, Law Librarian; OFFICER NFN STAATS; OFFICER NFN UPTERGRAFF; MR. NFN STEVENSON, Classification; CAPTAIN B. HINGER; OFFICER UPTAGRAFT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-01841-PMD) Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonso Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Heath McAlvin Stewart, III, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr., We dispense with contentions the court are and district court. No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?