Cecil Simmons v. Director Ozmint

Filing 920100122

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7906 CECIL SIMMONS, a/k/a Cecil Allen Simmons, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OZMINT; CAPTAIN Officer; MR. BURTT, BRIHART; DEBORAH ROWE, Hearing Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00860-RBH) Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cecil Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cecil Simmons seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Simmons, relief who on filed his a 42 U.S.C. for § 1983 (2006) complaint. with the motion reconsideration district court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) prior to filing his notice of appeal, requests only that this court remand the case to the district court so he may re-file objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation after his initial objections were destroyed in the mail. However, the district court has granted Simmons's motion and given him the opportunity to file his objections. moot. legal before Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?