US v. Lyndell Thomas
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LYNDELL THOMAS, a/k/a X-Man, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00058-BR-3)
March 30, 2010
April 5, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lyndell Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lyndell Thomas appeals the district court's order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm United States v. We legal
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Thomas, No. 3:93-cr-00058-BR-3 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?