Samuel Coil v. Hubert Peterkin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for stay pending appeal [998312116-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998279239-2] Originating case number: 1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998464262] [09-8008]
Samuel Coil v. Hubert Peterkin
Doc. 0
Case: 09-8008 Document: 30
Date Filed: 11/12/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8008 SAMUEL L. COIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUBERT PETERKIN, Hoke County Sheriff; JACKIE BREWINGTON, Captain, Chief Jailer/Administrator Hoke County; BARBRA MCDUFFIE, Lt. Asst./Administrator Hoke County, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD) Submitted: October 6, 2010 Decided: November 12, 2010
Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel L. Coil, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-8008 Document: 30
Date Filed: 11/12/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Samuel L. Coil appeals the district court's order We
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oct. 5, See Coil v. Peterkin, No. 1:07-cv-00145-WO-WWD (M.D.N.C. 2009). We deny Coil's motions for appointment of
counsel and for a stay.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?