Curtis Richardson v. South Carolina Department of C

Filing 920100226

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8017

CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIE EAGLETON, individually and officially; CAPTAIN ROGERS, et al. individually and officially; ROBIN CHAVIS, individually and officially, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-02597-RBH)

Submitted:

February 18, 2010

Decided:

February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Heath McAlvin Stewart, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court's

order denying his motion to reconsider the order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. and find no reversible error. reasons stated by the district We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the court. Richardson v. South

Carolina Dep't of Corr., No. 4:08-cv-02597-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in the the materials decisional

would

aid

process. AFFIRMED

2