Richard Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Filing 920100624

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8044

RICHARD SNYDER; CATHERINE SNYDER, Plaintiffs ­ Appellants, v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP; HARLEY LEWIN; STEPHEN J. JANET SHIH HAJEK; DIANE VON FURSTENBERG, LP, Defendants ­ Appellees, and DIANE VON FURSTENBERG STUDIO; LARISSA MACFARQUHAR; THE NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC.; CONDE NAST, INCORPORATED; ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED, trading as The New Yorker, Defendants. WADYKA;

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB)

Submitted:

June 17, 2010

Decided:

June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge.

KING,

Circuit

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Snyder, Catherine Snyder, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Gerard Connolly, Jacinda Ann Lanum, Patrick Pearse O'Donnell,

Christopher J. Wright, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Kevin B. Bedell, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM: Richard and Catherine Snyder appeal the district

court's orders dismissing their civil action and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See Snyder v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP,

by the district court.

No. 1:08-cv-01270-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. Oct. 29, 2009 & Jan. 11, 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

3