US v. Marlin Rainey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. MARLIN RAINEY, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3)
February 25, 2010
March 5, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlin Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Irvin McCreary Allen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; Robert Eric Friedman, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Marlin Rainey appeals the district court's order
denying his "Request for Nunc Pro Tunc and Amended Judgment." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. 1:95-cr-00387-TSE-3 (E.D. We dispense
Va. filed Oct. 21, 2009; entered Oct. 22, 2009).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?