Eugene King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Regional De


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:08-cv-04053-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998470267] [09-8073]

Download PDF
Eugene King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Regional De Doc. 0 Case: 09-8073 Document: 35 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8073 EUGENE KING, Plaintiff Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:08-cv-04053-TLW) Submitted: November 8, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010 Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 09-8073 Document: 35 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Eugene King appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of its order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate complaint. error. judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Reg'l Det. Ctr., district court. No. 0:08-cv-04053-TLW (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2009 & entered Oct. 20, 2009; July 21, 2009). We deny King's motions to appoint counsel, to compel, for an injunction, for summary judgment, and to alter or amend judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?