Eugene King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Regional De

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:08-cv-04053-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998470267] [09-8073]

Eugene King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Regional De

Doc. 0

Case: 09-8073 Document: 35

Date Filed: 11/22/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8073 EUGENE KING, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. ORANGEBURG CALHOUN REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER, Defendant ­ Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (0:08-cv-04053-TLW) Submitted: November 8, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 09-8073 Document: 35

Date Filed: 11/22/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Eugene King appeals the district court's order denying reconsideration of its order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate complaint. error. judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See King v. Orangeburg Calhoun Reg'l Det. Ctr.,

district court.

No. 0:08-cv-04053-TLW (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2009 & entered Oct. 20, 2009; July 21, 2009). We deny King's motions to appoint

counsel, to compel, for an injunction, for summary judgment, and to alter or amend judgment. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2