Dave Taylor v. City of Farmville
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998265077-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00963-AJT-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998401613] [09-8102]
<![CDATA[
Dave Taylor v. City of Farmville
Doc. 0
Case: 09-8102 Document: 23
Date Filed: 08/12/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8102 DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF FARMVILLE; FARMVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; FARMVILLE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; STATE OF VIRGINIA; PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY; OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00963-AJT-IDD) Submitted: July 8, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and August 12, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior
Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 09-8102 Document: 23
Date Filed: 08/12/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Dave Andrae Taylor, a federal prisoner, filed a
complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) seeking damages on the ground that Defendants failed to advise him at the time of his arrest in February 1999 of his rights under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention. The district court dismissed the action
without prejudice, concluding that Taylor's action was barred by the holding in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have
reviewed the record and the district court's order and conclude that pursuant to Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, 548 U.S. 331 (2006), the action was not barred by the holding in Heck. Accordingly,
we vacate the district court's order dismissing Taylor's action without prejudice and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We deny Taylor's motion for appointment of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
would
process. VACATED AND REMANDED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
