Titus Geer v. Tim Riley
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TITUS C. GEER, a/k/a Titus Geer, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TIM RILEY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (8:09-cv-01769-CMC)
February 25, 2010
March 5, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Titus C. Geer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Titus C. Geer, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. * justice or judge The order is not appealable unless a circuit issues a certificate of appealability. 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). not issue absent "a
A certificate of appealability will showing of the denial (2006). of a A that the or
constitutional prisoner reasonable
right." this would by
§ 2253(c)(2) by any
demonstrating assessment is of
wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.
322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have
independently reviewed the record and conclude that Geer has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate We dispense with oral
of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Although Geer filed his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006), the district court properly construed it as one appropriately filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006).
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?