US v. Thomas Littlejohn
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. THOMAS FLOYD LITTLEJOHN, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL)
June 17, 2010
June 24, 2010
Before MOTZ and Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
We have reviewed the
record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d Accordingly, we affirm the district reasons stated there. See United
197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010). court's order for the
States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?