US v. Terence Bullock
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. TERENCE DEWAYNE BULLOCK, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:00-cr-00060-JBF-1)
February 18, 2010
February 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terence Dewayne Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Terence Dewayne Bullock appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence. reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. Bullock, No. 4:00-crWe dispense with oral
by the district court.
00060-JBF-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2009).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?