Cecil Simmons v. Director Ozmint
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CECIL SIMMONS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OZMINT; CAPTAIN Officer; MR. BURTT, BRIHART; DEBORAH ROWE, Hearing
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00860-RBH)
May 20, 2010
May 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecil Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Cecil Simmons appeals the district court's order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we deny Simmons's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v.
Ozmint, No. 6:08-cv-00860-RBH (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?