Alvin Jones v. Gene Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:08-cv-00492-jlk-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998631585]. Mailed to: Alvin L. Jones. [09-8263]

Appeal: 09-8263

Document: 18

Date Filed: 07/14/2011

Page: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8263

ALVIN LUTHER JONES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON, Dir. of Dept. of Corr. Va.; HARVARD
STEPHENS, Chief Medical Officer for Dept. of Corr. Va.; G.
K. WASHINGTON, Regional Dir. (Central Region) Va.; W. J.
TOWNLEY, Warden/Supt. Halifax Corr. Field Unit #23; FRANK
WRAY, M.D.--Doctor Halifax Corr. Cntr. #23; SANDRA VASS,
R.N.--Head Nurse Halifax Corr. Unit #23; A. FIELDS, L.P.N.-Nurse Halifax Corr. Unit #23; J.M.C. BROWN, Grievance
Coordinator Halifax Corr. Unit #23,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:08-cv-00492-jlk-mfu)

Submitted:

July 8, 2011

Decided:

July 14, 2011

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Luther Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Appeal: 09-8263

Document: 18

Date Filed: 07/14/2011

Page: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 09-8263

Document: 18

Date Filed: 07/14/2011

Page: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Alvin Luther Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Jones v. Johnson, No. 7:08-cv-00492-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va.

court.

Oct. 30, 2009).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

the

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3