Victor White v. FNU Taylor
Filing
920100309
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1014
VICTOR B. WHITE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FNU TAYLOR; FNU MOSS; FNU SERGEANT; FNU SMITH; FNU PAULK; FNU CHILDS; FNU TRIMMER, Defendants - Appellees, and FNU SMEREKA; CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00257-FDW-DCK)
Submitted:
February 22, 2010
Decided:
March 9, 2010
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor B. White, Appellant Pro Se. David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM: Victor B. White seeks to appeal the district court's text orders dismissing some, but not all defendants, and denying reconsideration in this civil rights action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders White seeks
to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?