Albert Wilson v. Carolina Power & Light Company
Filing
402831190
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:05-cv-03597-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998353558] [10-1037]
<![CDATA[
Albert Wilson v. Carolina Power & Light Company
Doc. 402831190
Case: 10-1037
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/07/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1037 ALBERT PRESSLEY WILSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT Carolinas, Incorporated, COMPANY, d/b/a Progress Energy
Defendant Appellee, and PROGRESS ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, LLC, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:05-cv-03597-TLW) Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Pressley Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Zebulon Dyer Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, Appellee.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-1037
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/07/2010
Page: 2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 10-1037
Document: 11
Date Filed: 06/07/2010
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: Albert order accepting Pressley the Wilson appeals judge's the district court's and
magistrate
recommendation
dismissing Wilson's civil complaint in which he asserted claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2006), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (2006) and denying reconsideration thereof. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. Carolina Power & Light Co., No. 4:05-cv-03597We dispense with oral argument
TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 2, 2009).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
