Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-00318-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998470194] [10-1054]

Download PDF
Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen Doc. 0 Case: 10-1054 Document: 19 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1054 CHANDER KANT; ASHIMA K. KANT, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. JAY L. COHEN, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08cv-00318-RWT) Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: November 22, 2010 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chander Kant, Ashima K. Kant, Appellants Pro Se. Deborah Murrell Whelihan, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1054 Document: 19 Date Filed: 11/22/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Chander Kant and Ashima K. Kant appeal the district court's orders granting the Defendant's motion for summary We have judgment and denying their motion for reconsideration. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, See we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kant v. Cohen, No. 8:08-cv-00318-RWT (D. Md. Dec. 11, 2009; Oct. 14, 2009). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional contentions the court would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?