Bilonda Wa Kalonji v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A098-866-716,A098-865-889 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998423306] [10-1057]

Download PDF
Bilonda Wa Kalonji v. Eric Holder, Jr. Doc. 0 Case: 10-1057 Document: 21 Date Filed: 09/13/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1057 BILONDA WA KALONJI; ALULA NICKY KADIMA, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010 Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth A. Kohler, LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. BROMBERG, Washington, D.C., for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Francis W. Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Linda Y. Cheng, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1057 Document: 21 Date Filed: 09/13/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Bilonda Wa Kalonji and Alula Nicky Kadima, natives and citizens of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Petitioners' motion. See 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(a), (b), (c) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition See In re: Wa for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Kalonji (B.I.A. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?