Marsha Jameson v. United States Post Office

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00583-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998456765] [10-1099]

Download PDF
Marsha Jameson v. United States Post Office Doc. 0 Case: 10-1099 Document: 17 Date Filed: 11/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1099 MARSHA JAMESON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Office of the Inspector General; JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00583-CMH-TCB) Submitted: October 20, 2010 Decided: November 1, 2010 Before KING, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marsha Jameson, Appellant Pro Se. Assistant United States Attorney, Appellees. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Alexandria, Virginia, for Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1099 Document: 17 Date Filed: 11/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Marsha Jameson appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging employment Act. discrimination in violation of the Rehabilitation We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jameson v. United States Post Office, No. 1:09-cv-00583We CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 8, 2009; entered Dec. 9, 2009). deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because in the the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?