Frank Garland v. Ernest Levering
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
FRANK J. GARLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERNEST LEVERING, DAVID HARTMAN, c/o Balto Stevedore; DAVID P. HARTMAN;
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00941-RDB)
May 20, 2010
May 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank J. Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Collins, MICHAEL J. COLLINS, PC, Highland, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Frank J. Garland appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Ernest Levering and David P.
Hartman on Garland's claim of race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (2006). reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Garland v. Levering, No. 1:09-cv-00941We dispense with oral argument
by the district court.
RDB (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2010).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?