Lorette Lemond v. Jo Anne Barnhart


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:06-cv-00567-sgw-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998485429] [10-1139]

Download PDF
Lorette Lemond v. Jo Anne Barnhart Doc. 0 Case: 10-1139 Document: 12 Date Filed: 12/15/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1139 LORETTE M. LEMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00567-sgw-mfu) Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: December 15, 2010 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorette M. Lemond, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Giacchino, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Timothy J. Heaphy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Jillian Elizabeth Kipp, Assistant Regional Counsel, Eric P. Kressman, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1139 Document: 12 Date Filed: 12/15/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Lorette M. Lemond appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny Lemond disability insurance benefits. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Lemond v. Barnhart, No. 7:06-cv-00567We dispense with oral argument by the district court. sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2009). because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?