Willie Reynolds

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [998313860-2] Originating case number: 6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998443067] [10-1147]

Download PDF
Willie Reynolds Doc. 0 Case: 10-1147 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1147 In Re: WILLIE REYNOLDS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: September 15, 2010 (6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1) Decided: October 12, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1147 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/12/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Willie Reynolds has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Reynolds asks this court to order the district court to rule on his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction, as well as his motion to expedite the proceedings before the district court. Reynolds has also filed a motion to expedite the proceedings before this court. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court denied Reynolds' 3582(c)(2) motion on September 10, 2010, thereby rendering the motion to expedite pending in the district court moot. Accordingly, we deny Reynolds' mandamus petition and motion to expedite before this court as moot. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?