April Akers v. Highlands Community Services
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-00039-jpj-pms. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998548297]. [10-1198]
April Akers v. Highlands Community Services
Doc. 0
Case: 10-1198
Document: 26
Date Filed: 03/18/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1198
APRIL EDWINA SPARKS AKERS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD, Defendant Appellee, and JEFFREY FOX, Executive Director of Highlands Community Services; WASHINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; CITY OF BRISTOL, VIRGINIA, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00039-jpj-pms)
Submitted:
February 9, 2011
Decided:
March 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
E. Gay Leonard, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. Henry Keuling-Stout, KEULING-STOUT, PC, Big Stone Gap, Virginia, for Appellee.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-1198
Document: 26
Date Filed: 03/18/2011
Page: 2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 10-1198
Document: 26
Date Filed: 03/18/2011
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: April Edwina Sparks Akers appeals the district court's judgment granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on her
sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Akers v. Highlands Cmty. Servs. Bd., No. We dispense
district court.
1:08-cv-00039-jpj-pms (W.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2010).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?