Kathleen Arnold v. Citimortgage, Incorporated


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:07-cv-02617-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998464955] [10-1233]

Download PDF
Kathleen Arnold v. Citimortgage, Incorporated Doc. 0 Case: 10-1233 Document: 23 Date Filed: 11/15/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1233 KATHLEEN ARNOLD; TIMOTHY A. COTTEN, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, Assignee; LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK, F.S.B.; AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC; WELLS FARGO; CONGRESSIONAL FUNDING USA, LLC; STEWART TITLE GROUP, LLC; MARTIN DENNIS; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; RANDA SAMIR AZZAM, Substitute Trustee; DANIEL J. PESACHOWITZ; SAMUEL I. WHITE, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07cv-02617-RWT) Submitted: November 2, 2010 Decided: November 15, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathleen Arnold; Timothy A. Cotten, Appellants Pro Se. Bruce Edward Alexander, David M. Souders, Sandra B. Vipond, WEINER, BRODSKY, SIDMAN & KIDER, PC, Washington, D.C.; Glenn Cline, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Bruce Edward Covahey, Mark S. Devan, COVAHEY, BOOZER, DEVAN & DORE, PA, Towson, Maryland; for Appellees. Martin Dennis, Appellee Pro Se. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1233 Document: 23 Date Filed: 11/15/2010 Page: 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 10-1233 Document: 23 Date Filed: 11/15/2010 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Kathleen Arnold and Timothy A. Cotten appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' motions to dismiss their civil action. The record does not contain a transcript of Appellants have the burden the hearing on Defendants' motions. of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(b). proceeding transcripts on at appeal in forma pauperis in While appellants are entitled to government expense certain limited circumstances, see 28 U.S.C. 753(f) (2006), Arnold and Cotten paid the appellate filing fee and neither has filed an application for in forma pauperis status. By failing to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government expense, Arnold and Cotten have waived review of the issues on appeal that depend on the transcript to show error. See Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992) (per curiam); Keller v. Prince George's Cnty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). As no error appears on the record before We dispense with oral us, we affirm the district court's order. argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?