William Taccino v. HomEq Servicing

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:08-cv-00185-JPB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998452906] [10-1260]

William Taccino v. HomEq Servicing

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1260 Document: 20

Date Filed: 10/26/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1260 WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HOMEQ SERVICING; MANCINI & ASSOCIATES; U.S. BANK N/A; MORRIS SCHNEIDER PRYOR JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, LLC; G. DOUGLAS REINHARD; RICK CONNER; EXPRESS MORTGAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, P.C., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00185-JPB) Submitted: September 16, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se. Wendy Anne Owens, LAW OFFICE OF WENDY A. OWENS, PC, Savannah, Georgia; Marshall Howard Ross, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, PLC, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Jason Patrick Foster, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1260 Document: 20

Date Filed: 10/26/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino and Marlene M. Taccino appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this civil action. reversible error. by the district We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Taccino v. Homeq Serv., No.

3:08-cv-00185-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before

We dispense with contentions the court are and

adequately

presented

materials

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2